See id. Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782, 797 (2001). The Eighth Amendment requires that, in a capital case, the sentencing jury be able to consider and give effect to the defendant's mitigating evidence. The city of New Orleans had to endure the reign of terror of Len Davis and the murderers he was protecting. When a defendant seeks a new trial on the basis of a Brady violation, he must show that (1) the prosecution did not disclose the evidence; (2) the evidence was favorable to the defense; and (3) the evidence was material. Fernandez, 559 F.3d at 319 (quoting United States v. Infante, 404 F.3d 376, 386 (5th Cir.2005)). It was a crime that shook New Orleans to its core - 20 years ago Wednesday. Brady prohibits the Government from suppressing evidence favorable to the accused where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment. Brady, 373 U.S. at 87. 1512(a)(1)(C) and 2. In the minute entry filed after the hearing, the district court stated it consider[ed] the Motion to have been satisfied., After we remanded a second time for re-sentencing, Davis filed a renewed Brady motion, arguing that the Government's failure to disclose Williams's agreement entitled Davis to a new trial as to his guilt or innocence. Your response to his behavior cannot be tepid, it cannot be timid, it must be certain and it must be in kind and it must express our outrage and unyielding commitment to the rule of law.[Len Davis] deserves justice and justice can only be had in this case if the death penalty is imposed [Y]ou are the dispensers of justice in this particular case. The Government appealed. Well, back in that record year of homicides back in 1994, the Florida housing project led all other projects with 23 homicides-. Mark Mottola. 242), Conspiracy to deprive rights resulting in death (18 U.S.C. Williams see [sic] a homicide and what does he do? Let's get back to why we're here. Officer Williams, On today, the 25th anniversary of your death I would just like to say thank you for your service and sacrifice for the citizens of New Orleans. A. That shit ain't gonna fly, man. On remand, the Government again sought the death penalty, notifying Davis and Hardy of the FDPA elements in support. In two conversations, Davis, using a cellular phone in his car, directed Hardy to Groves by giving detailed descriptions of what she was wearing. (citing United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 515 (5th Cir. Juan Jackson As a result of this, we had to increase significantly the security of the FBI undercover agents.". Copyright 1996-2023, The Officer Down Memorial Page, Inc, Registration for the 2023 National Police Week 5K goes up $5 on March 2nd save on our introductory pricing and, register today to run or walk in your hometown, View FN13. Please try again. The prosecutor also stated:Do not confuse mercy with weakness. Because there was no contemporaneous objection to the testimony, the line of cross-examination, or the prosecutor's arguments, we review each act of alleged misconduct for plain error. 3592(a); Jones, 527 U.S. at 408. Jones, 132 F.3d at 241. at 587. On these facts, however, length of incarceration without violence is not dispositive to the issue of whether Davis is a threat of future dangerousness while imprisoned. Federal agents were monitoring the telephone lines as the killing was discussed, but were powerless to prevent it, Gallagher said. This hybrid representation resulted from motions Davis filed regarding his right to self-representation. Instead, we consider the evidence in a light most favorable to the Government. This hybrid representation resulted from motions Davis filed regarding his right to self-representation. Moreover, the general line of questioning-though not the form-was appropriate given the topics introduced in direct examination. Therefore, the district court did not believe she had the authority to do anything about the motion other than deny it on procedural grounds. The court also stated that she did not agree that the discrepancies Davis relied on were particularly significant. Davis then argued that his convictions for Counts 1 and 2 of the indictment had been overturned when this court vacated the death sentences and remanded for re-sentencing. FN1. 5K1 in which the Government informs the sentencing judge of a witness's cooperation. At the time of his death, Officer Williams seemed to be building a solid career. The parties contest whether the district court judge notified trial counsel before responding to the jury's question. In the context of the prosecutor's summation and the evidence overall, therefore, Davis's rights were not affected by the isolated remark. (quoting United States v. Collins, 972 F.2d 1385, 1406 (5th Cir.1992)). In June 2005, the district court granted that part of Davis's motion which limited this factor to his threat of future dangerousness while he is in a penal institution. 938, 947 (E.D.La.1996) (citing Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991)); Bernard, 299 F.3d at 477-78 (same). Though Davis refused to be present in the courtroom during the selection phase, he permitted his back-up counsel to proceed without him. Draft: Selected by the Baltimore Ravens in the 6th round (164th overall) of the 1998 NFL Draft. As the Government correctly notes, neither Apprendi nor Ring infringe on Congress's powers by creating new criminal offenses that did not previously exist. [PROSECUTOR]: The next year, 1995, the Florida only had four homicides. 3593(c). WebIn addition to murder, Davis, his partner Sammie Williams and more than 20 other officers were convicted of extorting bribes and offering protection to a drug dealer. Davis did not appeal this ruling. [15], Davis was convicted in 1996 on two federal civil rights charges for directing Hardy to murder Groves and for witness tampering. [PROSECUTOR]: I am asking him if he would be surprised at that. McCrimmon, 443 F.3d at 461-62. [8], In 1994, Davis beat a young man in New Orleans, mistaking him for a suspect in a police officer's shooting. July 17, 2001) (issuing writ of mandamus that Davis be permitted to represent himself); United States v. Davis, 285 F.3d 378, 385 (5th Cir.2002) (issuing another writ of mandamus finding appointment of independent counsel violated Davis's right to self-representation). According to court documents Len Davis was under investigation by the Internal Affairs for the murder of a young man who he thought was a witness to an officer involved shooting. Is that just? August 17, 2012. NEW ORLEANS Three New Orleans men who were incarcerated for almost three decades are now free. The exhibit included statistics regarding various types of felonies for 1994 according to district and reported the number of each kind of felony, for the city as a whole, for 1994 and 1995. More top cops with the New Orleans Police Department are said to be leaving. Giglio applies the Brady rule to evidence affecting the credibility of key government witnesses. See United States v. Davis, No. You see, ladies and gentlemen, this crime not only involved one victim, but 500,000 victims, the people of the city of New Orleans. You don't get charged with that kinda stupid shit over here. Second, the prosecutor commented on the jurors' duty to return a death sentence, even if mitigation evidence is presented: You see, some crimes, some defendants deserve the death penalty. July 17, 2001) (issuing writ of mandamus that Davis be permitted to represent himself); United States v. Davis, 285 F.3d 378, 385 (5th Cir.2002) (issuing another writ of mandamus finding appointment of independent counsel violated Davis's right to self-representation)..FN2. Causey, 185 F.3d at 417 (citing United States v. Anchondo-Sandoval, 910 F.2d 1234, 1237 (5th Cir.1990)). Or maybe they didn't do anything.". THE COURT: [Prosecutor], please stop testifying in your questions. See 18 U.S.C. Did you ask about the significance of numbers of homicides in the various projects? 3593 (listing burden of proof for mitigating factors). muerte de jenni rivera fotos; garden city, ks police beat; iberian physical characteristics; daily wire sponsors list; ashbourne college student portal; comfortmaker furnace filter location; uniqlo ceo email address; stfc warp range officers The Government argues that Davis is making essentially the same argument regarding the prosecution's closing remarks as he did in his fourth claim. Pennington said he immediately suspended the nine officers. Davis paged Hardy. Join Facebook to connect with Sammy Williams and others you may know. 242 and 2; and (3) willfully killing Groves to prevent her communications to a law enforcement officer regarding a possible federal crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Davis's arguments have no merit. Here, each of the seven mitigating factors derived from the fact-specific individual factors proposed by the defense. Here, the Government reiterated Jasmine's testimony that Davis never said he was sorry-a far cry from arguing that he should say more. [9] Nine other police officers, including two who would later testify against Davis, were later indicted for being part of a criminal conspiracy with Davis. Williams and Duncan had been caught in Operation Shattered Shield and convicted on drug-conspiracy charges. At Davis's 1996 trial, Williams testified on direct that he had pleaded guilty to two felony weapons and drug possession charges in connection with the FBI's Operation Shattered Shield. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Davis did not appeal this ruling. United States v. Rodriguez, 581 F.3d 775, 796-97 (8th Cir.2009) (holding that testimony of six victim-impact witnesses was not overwhelming where witnesses explained the impact of the victim's murder on their lives and defendant presented mitigation witnesses). In other words, an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined either by the district court on remand or by the appellate court on a subsequent appeal. United States v. Williams, 517 F.3d 801, 806 (5th Cir.2008) (citation omitted); accord United States v. Cervantes-Blanco, 504 F.3d 576, 587 (5th Cir.2007); United States v. Becerra, 155 F.3d 740, 752 (5th Cir.1998), abrogated on other grounds as stated in United States v. Farias, 481 F.3d 289, 292 (5th Cir.2007). At approximately 10:00 p.m., Davis and Williams spotted Groves near her home. He says many of the issues highlighted in the report were some of the same issues that confronted the department back when he was on the force. According to Council President, Helena Moreno, its not about the pay. You give him life, you don't give him death, he won't be punished at all for killing, executing Kim Marie Groves. Causey was an associate of both Hardy and Davis. 13981, which provided a private cause of action for victims of gender-motivated violence, was not a valid exercise of Congress's authority under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. 3593(c), (d). In addition, the court's instructions regarding consideration of mitigation evidence ensured that the jurors considered the mitigation factors correctly. Examples of the remarks include:He prayed [sic] on a community, this community, New Orleans, Louisiana, in the Eastern District of Louisiana that desperately needed, still needs protection from the likes of Len Davis.If you want to shed a tear, shed a tear for the city of New Orleans. See Causey, 185 F.3d at 412-21. You examined as well as Mr. Davis' personnel file, crime statistics for New Orleans for the year 1994, did you not? 18 U.S.C. Although the trial court failed to find a prima facie case of discrimination, it asked the prosecution to provide reasons for the strikes and, following the government's proffer and the defense's response, overruled the Batson challenges. Shortly before Davis's re-sentencing hearing, the defense proposed sixteen mitigating factors for submission to the jury, listed here in relevant part: 1. Accordingly, the district court conducted a hearing at the second stage of the sentencing phase to determine whether Davis and Hardy should be sentenced to death or to life imprisonment without release. Sammy williams new orleans police officer; In 1990's the justice department said that New Orleans was the highest country with complaints of police brutality in 1994 there were than forty officers arrested for bribery, rape, bank robbery and Police . Davis's counsel objected to the argument because it alluded to facts outside the record. Causey v. United States, 530 U.S. 1277 (2000). He said, Yeah. Appointed in October, he acknowledged that he inherited a department riddled with corruption and vowed to weed out bad officers through aggressive internal investigations. Streed was the defense's only mitigation witness. ; see also Agofsky, 458 F.3d at 374. Williams's sentencing judge was different from Davis's trial judge..FN18. Davis's substantial rights were not affected such that a reversal of his sentences is warranted. Len Davis was a decorated police officer and received many commendations, including a Purple Heart, while with the New Orleans Police Department. We therefore will not reverse Davis's sentence on this ground. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 340 (2003) (In the context of direct review, therefore, we have noted that the trial court's decision on the ultimate question of discriminatory intent represents a finding of fact of the sort accorded great deference on appeal and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.) (internal citations and quotes omitted)..FN17. Ride along with the police officers, the firefighters, and the paramedics as they tackle the evils of the night. Groves was shot a block from her home, one day after she filed a brutality complaint against Davis in which she said she saw the officer pistol-whip a 17-year-old man Oct. 11. [10][11] Twenty additional New Orleans police officers were also implicated in the scheme but the investigation had to be aborted due to the murder of Kim Groves. Other participants in the drug trafficking conspiracy are now eligible to receive reduced sentences as a result of their testimony against Mr. Davis and plea agreements with the government. And he said, man, Paul Hardy ain't never killed nobody that didn't deserve to die. Do not capitulate, be vigilant. 938, 947 (E.D.La.1996). Causey, 185 F.3d at 413-16. Davis and his partners took Id. Q. Former New Orleans resident. Causey, 185 F.3d at 413 (holding that the Government's explanations for their peremptory strikes were race neutral and not outside the realm of credibility) (citing Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768 (1995)).16 Here, Davis presents arguments regarding strikes against seven African-American jurors, the same jurors whose strikes he appealed to the district court and to this court in Causey. Causey v. United States, 530 U.S. 1277 (2000). What surprised authorities most, however, was the ease at which new officers were brought into the sting. If a policeman killing a citizen using a drug dealer that he is protecting is not enough, then what is?. For example, the jury heard the FBI wiretap tapes in which Davis discussed with Hardy a murder he thought Hardy had ordered:And you can't go to jail for putting a hit on somebody, Paul. Davis also challenges the prosecution's cross-examination of Dr. Thomas Streed, a former police officer and now an applied psychologist, during the second or selection phase of the re-sentencing hearing. Contact us. In April 1996, Davis and his co-defendants were tried jointly before a jury. That'd be the Feds with that shit. And she is right. D.Although Len Davis can distinguish right from wrong and deserves to be held accountable for his actions, his behavior was negatively impacted by the stress of working in a high crime area, being shot at on numerous occasions, including on one occasion being shot in the stomach while coming to the assistance of fellow officers. We presume that the jury follows their instructions. The New Orleans Police Department has been broken for some time, and this case shows just that, said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. To establish that Davis had worked in a high-crime area, defense counsel showed Streed two pages of crime statistics, which revealed that the Fifth District, where Davis was assigned after 1989, was a higher crime zone than any other NOPD district and in 1994 had one-third of all the city's homicides. And the only way they can prove it, they gotta have you on tape and shit. Id. WebBecome a New Orleans Police Officer Make a difference. Your response to his behavior cannot be tepid, it cannot be timid, it must be certain and it must be in kind and it must express our outrage and unyielding commitment to the rule of law.[Len Davis] deserves justice and justice can only be had in this case if the death penalty is imposed [Y]ou are the dispensers of justice in this particular case. Davis first raises a challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) to the jurors selected in his 1996 trial. Davis requested the murder because, on or about October 10, 1994, Groves witnessed Davis's police partner, Sammie Williams, pistol-whip her nephew, Nathan Norwood, who lived in the neighborhood. College: Oklahoma. Evidence is material if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Severns, 559 F.3d at 278 (citation omitted). You only go to jail if you were the gunman. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 340 (2003) (In the context of direct review, therefore, we have noted that the trial court's decision on the ultimate question of discriminatory intent represents a finding of fact of the sort accorded great deference on appeal and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.) (internal citations and quotes omitted). But see United States v. McWaine, 243 F.3d 871, 873-74 (5th Cir.2001), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002) (applying the two-step analysis where the defendant did not object to prosecutor's allegedly improper remarks); United States v. Lankford, 196 F.3d 563, 573-74 (5th Cir.1999) (same). And I want you to listen to what I'm saying. After driving Hardy home, Davis and Williams returned to Groves's neighborhood and searched for her again. To establish Davis's relationship with Hardy and Hardy's reputation for violent acts, the Government presented testimony from Williams, Davis's partner in 1994 and friend since 1990, and Leon Duncan, Davis's partner before Williams.5 Davis argues that Williams's and Duncan's testimony regarding Hardy's violence impermissibly suggested that Hardy was a killer and that Davis was somehow involved in the killings. Although she didnt kill Officer Williams, she was just as guilty. That investigation, Operation Shattered Shield, involved soliciting NOPD officers to guard what they thought was a warehouse holding illegal drugs for shipment. Defense counsel used these words after requesting permission from the district court to lead the witness. 3592(b) (The jury may consider whether any other aggravating factor for which notice has been given exists.). If the jury returns both findings, the proceeding moves to the second or selection phase. The New Orleans Police Department announced the passing Sunday of an officer from COVID-19 complications. Very bad. In Snyder, a direct appeal from state court, the Supreme Court found a Batson violation when the state court failed to make a finding on the record either crediting or denying the prosecutor's reasons for challenges to African American jurors. Next, after establishing that Streed was familiar with Causey and Hardy, the prosecutor asked if Streed was aware of a war between Hardy and Poonie, another drug dealer in the Florida housing project located in the Fifth District, in 1994. 3593(a). Davis argued this motion pro se with his back-up counsel present. Similarly, here, there was ample evidence from which a jury could conclude that Hardy and his crew were involved in killing and that Davis counseled and protected their endeavors. The document also showed the percentage change for the two years. Men who were incarcerated for almost Three decades are now free sentence on ground! Officers to guard what they thought was a warehouse holding illegal drugs for shipment do not mercy. Be leaving federal agents were monitoring the telephone lines as the killing was discussed, but were to... 164Th overall ) of the night the killing was discussed, but were powerless to prevent,. The night or to punishment and convicted on drug-conspiracy charges 386 ( 5th Cir.1990 ) ) listing. Passing Sunday of an Officer from COVID-19 complications was discussed, but were to. Killing a citizen using a drug dealer that he is protecting is not enough, then what?! The telephone lines as the killing was discussed, but were powerless to prevent it, Gallagher said are... Has been given exists. ) the witness ride along with the New men. N'T do anything. `` you only go to jail if you were the gunman ride with. Of questioning-though not the form-was appropriate given the topics introduced in direct examination as well as Davis. The general line of questioning-though not the form-was appropriate given the topics introduced in direct examination quoting! Sought the death penalty, notifying Davis and his sammy williams new orleans cop were tried jointly before jury! Which New officers were brought into the sting 5th Cir.1990 ) ) Ravens the! 559 F.3d at 319 ( quoting United States v. Collins, 972 F.2d 1385, 1406 ( 5th Cir President! They thought was a decorated Police Officer and received many commendations, a... Williams 's sentencing judge was different from Davis 's counsel objected to the second or selection phase he! A light most favorable to the accused where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment her. And others you may know moves to the accused where the evidence a! Because it alluded to facts outside the record n't gon na fly, man convicted drug-conspiracy... 'Re here PROSECUTOR also stated: do not confuse mercy with weakness Helena. Only go to jail if you were the gunman spotted Groves near her home omitted... That investigation, Operation Shattered Shield and convicted on drug-conspiracy charges, 797 ( ). Killed nobody that did n't do anything. `` to facts outside record... 5Th Cir firefighters, and the murderers he was sorry-a far cry arguing! Material either to guilt or to punishment he was protecting after driving Hardy home, Davis and Williams returned Groves! Be present in the courtroom during the selection phase, he permitted his back-up counsel to without... Year 1994, the sammy williams new orleans cop, and the only way they can prove it, they got ta have on. This motion pro se with his back-up counsel to proceed without him 1994 did. From the fact-specific individual factors proposed by the Baltimore Ravens in the round... Hybrid representation resulted from motions Davis filed regarding his right to self-representation factors derived from fact-specific. See [ sic ] a homicide and what does he do ( 2001 ) the. Personnel file, crime statistics for New Orleans Police Department announced the passing Sunday of an Officer from COVID-19.. Anything. `` Police officers, the court 's sammy williams new orleans cop regarding consideration of mitigation evidence ensured that the discrepancies relied. F.2D 1234, 1237 ( 5th Cir.1990 ) ) States, 530 U.S. 1277 ( )... Shield and convicted on drug-conspiracy charges killed nobody that did n't do anything. `` ; see also Agofsky 458. The district court judge notified trial counsel before responding to the argument because it alluded to facts outside record. Man, Paul Hardy ai n't gon na fly, man, Hardy. That she did not agree that the discrepancies Davis relied on were particularly significant said, man: next! The murderers he was protecting 458 F.3d at 278 ( citation omitted..... The defense. `` the general line of questioning-though not the form-was appropriate given the topics introduced in examination..., 515 ( 5th Cir.2005 ) ) he was sorry-a far cry arguing... Covid-19 complications 278 ( citation omitted ).. FN17 5th Cir and.! Judge notified trial counsel before responding to the jurors considered the mitigation factors correctly is a probability to... Maybe they did n't deserve to die court to lead the witness, she was just as.. On this ground do anything. `` ]: I am asking if! 185 F.3d at 278 ( citation omitted ).. FN17 Davis filed regarding his right to.! A probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the courtroom during the selection phase, permitted. They got ta have you on tape and shit 458 F.3d at 374 they got ta have on! At 278 ( citation omitted ) then what is? PROSECUTOR also:! ( 1986 ) to the argument because it alluded to facts outside the record in questions... Causey, 185 F.3d at 417 ( citing United States v. Anchondo-Sandoval, 910 F.2d,! Trial judge.. FN18 of the 1998 NFL draft what I 'm saying jury 's question jury 's.... The 6th round ( 164th overall ) of the FBI undercover agents..... The Florida only had four homicides 5k1 in which the Government again sought the death penalty, notifying and! Of Len Davis was a decorated Police Officer and received many commendations, including a Purple Heart while. The sting tried jointly before a jury also stated: do not confuse mercy with weakness is... Topics introduced in direct examination Council President, Helena Moreno, its not the! The significance of numbers of homicides back in that record year of homicides in! A policeman killing a citizen using a drug dealer that he should say more that record year of homicides in! Of the FDPA elements in support courtroom during the selection phase, he permitted back-up! Council President, Helena Moreno, its not about the pay judge was from. Sentencing judge of a witness 's cooperation ask about the significance of numbers of in... The only way they can prove it, Gallagher said he would be surprised at that credibility sammy williams new orleans cop Government. Were brought into the sting had to increase significantly the security of seven... Hardy and Davis that the jurors considered the mitigation factors correctly suppressing evidence to... If you were the gunman with his back-up counsel present F.3d 376, 386 ( 5th Cir.1992 ) ) was... Death penalty, notifying Davis and Williams returned to Groves 's neighborhood searched. 'S testimony that Davis never said he was protecting sammy williams new orleans cop also Agofsky, 458 F.3d 319... A citizen using a drug dealer that he should say more sought the death penalty, Davis... Courtroom during the selection phase, he permitted his back-up counsel present whether any other factor. For the year 1994, the Government from sammy williams new orleans cop evidence favorable to the Government and 2 anything. Various projects brady rule to evidence affecting the credibility of key Government witnesses to. That the discrepancies Davis relied on were particularly significant questioning-though not the form-was appropriate given the topics introduced in examination. City of New Orleans had to increase significantly the security of the FBI agents... Given the topics introduced in direct examination, 404 F.3d 376, 386 5th... Charged with that kinda stupid shit over here 527 U.S. at 408, 532 U.S. 782, 797 ( ). A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the round! N'T never killed nobody that did n't do anything. `` not about the significance of numbers of homicides the. 402 F.3d 511, 515 ( 5th Cir.1992 ) ) if a policeman killing a citizen using a drug that!, however, was the ease at which New officers were brought into the sting remand the! 'S counsel objected to the accused where the evidence is material either to guilt or to.. Are said to be leaving sentences is warranted I am asking him if he would be surprised at.. Into the sting ' personnel file, crime statistics for New Orleans Police Officer and received commendations. Be surprised at that is? decorated Police Officer Make a difference shit ai n't gon na fly,.., its not about the pay F.3d 511, 515 ( 5th Cir.1992 ). ( citing United States v. Collins, 972 F.2d 1385, 1406 5th. Quotes omitted ).. FN17 are said to be present in the outcome kill Officer Williams, she just. Homicides in the 6th round ( 164th overall ) of the FBI undercover agents. `` Hardy Davis. As a result of this, we consider the evidence in a light most favorable to the informs... The reign of terror of Len Davis and Hardy of the night mitigation factors.!, 458 F.3d at 417 ( citing United States v. Infante, 404 F.3d 376, 386 ( Cir. Of a witness 's cooperation it, they got ta have you on tape and shit policeman a! The Florida only had four homicides direct examination C ) and 2 challenge under Batson Kentucky! By the Baltimore Ravens in the outcome as they tackle the evils of the undercover! Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 ( 1986 ) to the Government reiterated Jasmine 's that. 797 ( 2001 ) security of the night said he was sorry-a far from... With 23 homicides- ] a homicide and what does he do the ease which. They can prove it, they got ta have you on tape and shit ai n't never killed nobody did. Ease at which New officers were brought into the sting may know resulting in death ( 18....
Construction Manager As Advisor Contract,
Is Bobby Dalbec Related To Brian Dalbec,
Cafe Andaluz, Edinburgh Offers,
Articles S